Was in a Boing Boing thread<\/a><\/p>\n
“Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. Both words are normally used in so vague a way that any definition is liable to be challenged, but one must draw a distinction between them, since two different and even opposing ideas are involved. By ‘patriotism’ I mean devotion to a particular place and a particular way of life, which one believes to be the best in the world but has no wish to force on other people. Patriotism is of its nature defensive, both militarily and culturally. Nationalism, on the other hand, is inseparable from the desire for power.”<\/p>\n
— George Orwell<\/p>\n
\u201cThere is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.\u201d<\/p>\n
— Isaac Asimov<\/p>\n
Does it follow that I reject all authority?\u00a0 Perish the thought.\u00a0 In the matter of boots, I defer to the authority of the boot-maker.<\/p>\n
— Mikhail Bakunin<\/p>\n
The followers must feel humiliated by the ostentatious wealth and force of their
\nenemies. When I was a boy I was taught to think of Englishmen as the five-meal people.
\nThey ate more frequently than the poor but sober Italians. Jews are rich and help each
\nother through a secret web of mutual assistance. However, the followers must be
\nconvinced that they can overwhelm the enemies. Thus, by a continuous shifting of
\nrhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak. Fascist
\ngovernments are condemned to lose wars because they are constitutionally incapable of
\nobjectively evaluating the force of the enemy.<\/p>\n
— Umberto Eco – Ur-Fascism<\/a><\/p>\n Was in a Boing Boing thread<\/a><\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blog.ckms.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/antifa-both-weak-wristed-liberals-and-an-serious-threat-.jpeg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n